Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editorBaranski, Marci R.en_US
dc.creatorChapman, Jennifer E.en_US
dc.creatorZhang, Marken_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-23T21:18:05Z
dc.date.available2014-05-23T21:18:05Z
dc.date.created2014-05-23en_US
dc.date.issued2014-05-23
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10776/7894
dc.description.abstractIn the case Randy M. Roman v. Augusta N. Roman (2006), the Court of Appeals of Texas followed courts in other states and upheld the validity and enforceability of in vitro fertilization (IVF) consent agreements. The Romans, a divorced couple, each sought different outcomes for their cryopreserved preembryos created during their marriage. Randy Roman sought to have them destroyed, and Augusta Roman sought to implant them in an attempt to have biological children. The Texas court, citing several related cases, declared that the written IVF consent form the Romans had signed would govern the outcome of the cryopreserved preembryos.en_US
dc.format.mediumtext/xhtmlen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherArizona State University. School of Life Sciences. Center for Biology and Society. Embryo Project Encyclopedia.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofEmbryo Project Encyclopediaen_US
dc.rightsCopyright Arizona Board of Regentsen_US
dc.subjectLawen_US
dc.subject.lcshFrozen human embryosen_US
dc.subject.lcshFertilization in vitroen_US
dc.subject.meshEmbryo Dispositionen_US
dc.subject.meshFertilization in vitroen_US
dc.titleRoman v. Roman (2006)en_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.rights.licenseLicensed as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.subject.embryoLegalen_US
dc.subject.tagembryoen_US
dc.subject.tagIVFen_US
dc.description.typeArticlesen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record