Show simple item record

dc.creatorHeathcotte, Brocken_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-10T13:18:27Z
dc.date.available2012-05-10T13:18:27Z
dc.date.created2008-05-09en_US
dc.date.issued2012-05-10
dc.identifier.otherembryo:125158en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10776/1781
dc.description.abstractThis influential opinion was copied throughout the United States allowing civil actions and wrongful death claims on behalf of children who suffered injuries while a viable fetus. The case essentially overruled the opinion by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in Dietrich v. Inhabitants of Northampton (1884). However, the ability to sue was usually limited in two ways: the fetus had to be viable, and a child had to be born alive to have a claim. These two restrictions have recently been removed in many jurisdictions.en_US
dc.format.mediumtext/xhtmlen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherArizona State University. School of Life Sciences. Center for Biology and Society. Embryo Project Encyclopedia.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofEmbryo Project Encyclopediaen_US
dc.rights© Arizona Board of Regentsen_US
dc.subjectLawen_US
dc.subject.meshFetusen_US
dc.titleBonbrest v. Kotz [Brief] (1946)en_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.rights.licenseLicensed as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
dc.subject.embryoLegalen_US
dc.subject.embryoReproductionen_US
dc.subject.tagFetusen_US
dc.subject.tagBioethicsen_US
dc.description.typeArticlesen_US
dc.date.createdstandard2008-05-09


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record